Pentax reviews
(Sunday, January 17th, 2010)
I just updated the tests/reviews in the database of the SLR photo cameras, mostly for the Pentax and Samsung cameras (and some Nikon, Sony, Canon, too).
(Sunday, January 17th, 2010)
I just updated the tests/reviews in the database of the SLR photo cameras, mostly for the Pentax and Samsung cameras (and some Nikon, Sony, Canon, too).
(Thursday, January 14th, 2010)
AlphaMountWorld just produced a very interesting comparative review of three of the most attractive digital SLR photo cameras now on the market:
Of course, this test is listed in the list of comparisons/reviews attached to the feature page of each of these cameras (follow the links above).
Source: AlphaMountWorld.com Sony Alpha A500, Nikon D5000, and Canon EOS Rebel T1i- Compared
(Thursday, December 3rd, 2009)
If you are looking for the best SLR camera that your money can buy, you have certainly seen the announcement of the latest pro cameras from Nikon and Canon as very interesting. Both the Canon EOS 1D Mark IV and the Nikon D3S pretend to be very fast cameras and to have actual record sensitivity (up to ISO 102400).
But, even if you are ready to switch from your current brand of photo camera, which one should you choose? There are a few comparisons that are starting to pop around the Internet and I want to list them to you:
So, which one is yours now?
(Thursday, October 8th, 2009)
I just got a Sony Carl Zeiss 16-35mm f/2.8 ZA SSM zoom (Mfr# SAL1635Z) and I wanted to share with you my first impressions.
Obviously, this is a pro-level mechanical design. You immediately notice the weight of this zoom lens (at no less than 1.9 lbs (860g), this is not a cheap plastic lens). Some photographers may even find it too heavy for ease, but if you tend to use your wide-angle zoom on a tripod, you won’t notice it and it will bring some additional stability to the SLR Alpha-series camera body.
The bulk of the objective is in relation, but it offers several noticeable advantages:
Now, if you start playing with the lens, as I did on a Sony Alpha 700, the operation is very smooth. Obviously, the presence of the SSM motor is helping a lot and AF operation is nearly totally silent, while very fast.
Now, I could not yet evaluate the image quality (the lens is announced as having a high IQ), and I will provide some more info when I will be able to play with it (probably during my trip to Nepal next week).
(Friday, July 10th, 2009)
Major update to the photo SLR camera database: More than 30 new tests and reviews, in English, in French, for nearly all the photo cameras listed here.
All in all, you will find several hundred SLR camera tests, feature lists, prices and the special offers from our preferred partners.
(Thursday, May 21st, 2009)
Kudos to OK1000 Pentax Blog for their actual review of the new Pentax K-7. Short, but apparently not only a rewriting of the Pentax Press Release.
(Wednesday, November 26th, 2008)
It is often difficult but manageable to group lens reviews in order to compare/evaluate a little more than their mere physical characteristics (focal length, aperture/diaphragm, or even number of individual lenses). But how would you evaluate/review optical quality? When I see the difference really impressive between two lenses, I would be prepared to judge from their price, but a cheap wide-angle lens is not always worse than a slightly more expensive one (well… if the price difference is really large, it’s not only an accident and quality explains a lot).
So, where to?
I collected a few web sites appearing quite able to provide this kind of quality reviews/comparisons/evaluations/tests.
| Site | Canon lenses | Nikon lenses | Sony lenses | All the reviews/tests | |
| SLR gear | Canon lens | Nikon lens | Sony, Minolta | Lens reviews | In-depth, but a lot of lenses are still not reviewed (only a mere characteristics list) |
| Photozone | Canon EOS (APS-C) | Nikon (APS-C) | Sony Alpha (APS-C) | All reviews | In-depth reviews. There are few older lenses (it would be useful on the second-hand market). |
| Fred Miranda | Canon | Nikon | All reviews |
Canon, Nikon, that’s all. Tests are done by the users/visitors. So, quality of the reviews is… uneven, at best. |
|
| Dyxum | Sony, Minolta |
Sony, Minolta, Konica, only. Tests are done by the users/visitors. So, quality of the reviews is… uneven. |
|||
| Photodo | All lens reviews | In-depth analysis, but only sorted by date | |||
| dpreview | Lens reviews | Not many reviews yet, but an obvious professionalism | |||
| PopPhoto | Camera lenses | Precision of the analysis stays questionable (never very far from re-writing the characteristics list from the manufacturer) | |||
| lightrules | Lens reviews | A bit confusing to read, but there are systematic images that you can use to make your own opinion | |||
| Optyczne | Canon | Nikkor | Sony | Search engine | Beware, this is in Polish |
| 16-9.net | Lens reviews by date | Many more comparisons than individual reviews | |||
| Bj酶rn R酶rslett | - | Nikon ‘F’ Mount | - | - | Purely qualitative opinions, but coming from a pro-photographer really obsessed with image quality (Nikon-only) |
| Le Monde de la Photo | Tous les tests | Still not many reviews, but very in-depth. In French. | |||
| Pictchallenge | Actualit茅s et tests | The site is nearly impossible to browse (too confusing), but the level of details is definitely interesting for those reading a little French. | |||
| AlphaMountWorld.com | Sony, Minolta |
Reviews for Sony, Minolta, only. Not all lenses, though. Usually no figures, but some samples images and detailed advice. |
|||
| Photo.net | Canon | Nikon | Sony | All incl. Tamron, Sigma, Pentax, Olympus, Leica, Mamiya | The list is impressive, but many listed lenses only have “Reader comments” and no “review“. |
| NewCameraReview | Sony, Minolta | Reviews for Sony, Minolta, only. But the tests are full of details with many sample images along with the individual tests. | |||
| NaturePixel | Essais objectifs et bo卯tiers (in French) | Only Canon, a few lenses only, but clean pictures, a neat work and a very readable conclusion. | |||
| The-Digital-Picture.com |
Canon zoom lenses Canon lenses Canon EF-S lenses All Canon and Canon-compatible equipment reviews |
Only Canon, but commendable analysis. | |||
| MomentCorporation | Lens Reviews (both AF and manual focus lenses) | Nikon lenses (and less than 10 other lenses). A few accessories and Nikon cameras, too. | |||
| Photography Review | Canon lenses | Nikon lenses | Sony lenses | All lens user reviews | Those are mostly user reviews, so they lack details and precision, but they are worth reading anyway. |
| Kurt Munger | Sony & compatible lenses | Only Sony, but the analysis is very well detailed and the advice is always precise. | |||
| LensPlay reviews (Bob Atkins) | Canon Database | Only for Canon, the web site is a little hard to use. | |||
From here, I invite you to an orgy of lens reviews, lens tests, lens comparisons, lens evaluations. And remember to shoot some photos, too. It’s not only the lens which does the photo. Some are shot by telephones, if the photographer is an artist.
|
|
|