<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for YLovePhoto	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en</link>
	<description>Intrigued by photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:43:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon D4s by Nikon D4s user manuals &#124; YLovePhoto		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/slr/nikon/nikon-d4s/#comment-8581</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikon D4s user manuals &#124; YLovePhoto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?page_id=12152#comment-8581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Nikon D4s [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Nikon D4s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon 800mm f/5.6 E FL ED VR: new, big, black by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2013/03/28/nikon-800mm-f5-6-e-fl-ed-vr-new-big-black/#comment-8414</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11812#comment-8414</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This lens is delayed by a few weeks (officially, end of April). Probably nothing very noticeable, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lens is delayed by a few weeks (officially, end of April). Probably nothing very noticeable, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Ansel Adams documentary by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/03/23/ansel-adams-documentary/#comment-7825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11367#comment-7825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry that, at the time of publication of this article, the video was already removed. This is exactly what happens when you prepare a few posts in advance to quietly travel to the Indian national parks (in order to shoot a few wild tigers of course).

This was corrected this evening.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that, at the time of publication of this article, the video was already removed. This is exactly what happens when you prepare a few posts in advance to quietly travel to the Indian national parks (in order to shoot a few wild tigers of course).</p>
<p>This was corrected this evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Jens Olof Lasthein by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/28/jens-olof-lasthein/#comment-7624</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11424#comment-7624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just follow the link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lasthein.se/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jens gallery&lt;/a&gt;.

http://www.lasthein.se/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just follow the link to <a href="http://www.lasthein.se/" rel="nofollow">Jens gallery</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lasthein.se/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.lasthein.se/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Jens Olof Lasthein by Bartosz Strzelec		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/28/jens-olof-lasthein/#comment-7623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bartosz Strzelec]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11424#comment-7623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I came here from Bing thinkink it&#039;s photography blog, but where are You shots ? Is it all?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came here from Bing thinkink it&#8217;s photography blog, but where are You shots ? Is it all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Leaked or fake videos of Photoshop CS6 by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/06/leaked-or-fake-videos-of-photoshop-cs6/#comment-7347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11396#comment-7347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;CENTER&gt;&lt;iframe width=&quot;585&quot; height=&quot;426&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/UrlsnQ32YhY?rel=0&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtu.be/UrlsnQ32YhY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;YOUTUBE LINK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/CENTER&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><iframe width="585" height="426" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UrlsnQ32YhY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br /><a href="http://youtu.be/UrlsnQ32YhY" rel="nofollow">YOUTUBE LINK</a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on 13000€ for the big grey Sony 500mm by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/08/13000e-for-the-big-grey-sony-500mm/#comment-7312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11442#comment-7312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Sony big prime lens demonstrated by Engadget.

&lt;iframe id=&quot;viddler-804f411b&quot; src=&quot;//www.viddler.com/embed/804f411b/?f=1&amp;offset=0&amp;autoplay=0&amp;secret=66119828&amp;disablebranding=0&quot; width=&quot;545&quot; height=&quot;349&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sony big prime lens demonstrated by Engadget.</p>
<p><iframe id="viddler-804f411b" src="//www.viddler.com/embed/804f411b/?f=1&#038;offset=0&#038;autoplay=0&#038;secret=66119828&#038;disablebranding=0" width="545" height="349" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sigma SD1: Back to mental stability by Stan		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/09/sigma-sd1-back-to-mental-stability/#comment-7296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11458#comment-7296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And i don&#039;t believe a word of what they say about the manufacturing costs.
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120207006817/en]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And i don&#8217;t believe a word of what they say about the manufacturing costs.<br />
<a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120207006817/en" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120207006817/en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sigma SD1: Back to mental stability by Stan		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/09/sigma-sd1-back-to-mental-stability/#comment-7295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11458#comment-7295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Comapre this price to the nex Nikon D800. Both are at the same price, but the performance is not even comaprable. I would not even think of buying a Sigma if I did nto have a bunch of old Sigma lenses to keep.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comapre this price to the nex Nikon D800. Both are at the same price, but the performance is not even comaprable. I would not even think of buying a Sigma if I did nto have a bunch of old Sigma lenses to keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on 13000€ for the big grey Sony 500mm by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/08/13000e-for-the-big-grey-sony-500mm/#comment-7290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11442#comment-7290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To be noticed, the weight is astonishingly low at 3460g.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be noticed, the weight is astonishingly low at 3460g.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Canon EOS 1D X : Test in Spain by starfi		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2012/02/03/canon-eos-1d-x-test-in-spain/#comment-7218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[starfi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11383#comment-7218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Please, please, please !!!
We expect for Hi-Res CR2 files !!!
Don&#039;t care about how it works, we already know it well....

Tkx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, please, please !!!<br />
We expect for Hi-Res CR2 files !!!<br />
Don&#8217;t care about how it works, we already know it well&#8230;.</p>
<p>Tkx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon D7100 or Nikon D400? by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/11/01/nikon-d7100-or-nikon-d400/#comment-6930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11135#comment-6930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mitchell,
The Nikon D7100 is still very much a rumor. So, there is no known &amp; safe feature list. What I heard here is only a very limited bit of information centered around the use of the 24 Mp sensor originating at Sony.

However, as I always insist upon: Never base your purchasing decisions on rumors (even from the excellent YLovePhoto web site!) or even just announced products. The best camera you&#039;ll get is the one you buy and use, not the one you dream about and wait for.

For now, the D7100 would probably look a lot like a copycat of the D7000 with a bigger sensor (possibly with minor improvements to video grabbing and to buffer size for continuous shooting).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitchell,<br />
The Nikon D7100 is still very much a rumor. So, there is no known &#038; safe feature list. What I heard here is only a very limited bit of information centered around the use of the 24 Mp sensor originating at Sony.</p>
<p>However, as I always insist upon: Never base your purchasing decisions on rumors (even from the excellent YLovePhoto web site!) or even just announced products. The best camera you&#8217;ll get is the one you buy and use, not the one you dream about and wait for.</p>
<p>For now, the D7100 would probably look a lot like a copycat of the D7000 with a bigger sensor (possibly with minor improvements to video grabbing and to buffer size for continuous shooting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon D7100 or Nikon D400? by Mitchell brown		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/11/01/nikon-d7100-or-nikon-d400/#comment-6925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11135#comment-6925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can anyone tell me what the possibilities of the nikon d7100 might be? I am looking into a d7000 at the moment but was wondering if I should wait for the release of the nikon d7100? If possible would you be able to tell me what the features of d7100 might contain?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me what the possibilities of the nikon d7100 might be? I am looking into a d7000 at the moment but was wondering if I should wait for the release of the nikon d7100? If possible would you be able to tell me what the features of d7100 might contain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Photoshop CS6: a preview of the alpha version by Michael Ma		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/29/photoshop-cs6-a-preview-of-the-alpha-version/#comment-6753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 15:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8881#comment-6753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is true, Adobe did market Content Aware Fill/Scale as almost a fool proof tool to fix shots made without any effort, so that you can make magic in your photographs, again, without any effort.  It turned out to be quite the opposite.  It is still a very powerful tool, when used right.  It can often do what no other tools can do in one shot, and a lot of the times, it needs no further touch-ups.  This translates to less time you spend touching up photographs.

Translating that to what we see here, sure, you can try to automate the post processing.  Sometimes it will be great, sometimes it will be unusable.  But it will be a great tool to have in the bag to save you time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true, Adobe did market Content Aware Fill/Scale as almost a fool proof tool to fix shots made without any effort, so that you can make magic in your photographs, again, without any effort.  It turned out to be quite the opposite.  It is still a very powerful tool, when used right.  It can often do what no other tools can do in one shot, and a lot of the times, it needs no further touch-ups.  This translates to less time you spend touching up photographs.</p>
<p>Translating that to what we see here, sure, you can try to automate the post processing.  Sometimes it will be great, sometimes it will be unusable.  But it will be a great tool to have in the bag to save you time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on You only need two filters by Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/10/you-only-need-two-filters/#comment-6662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10652#comment-6662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for coming back with specific brand names.
I have inadvertantly checked the problems with an older linear polarizer on a digital camera. The auto-focus goes mad, presumably because the auto-focus light path goes through its own linear polarizers. Switching to manual focus works fine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for coming back with specific brand names.<br />
I have inadvertantly checked the problems with an older linear polarizer on a digital camera. The auto-focus goes mad, presumably because the auto-focus light path goes through its own linear polarizers. Switching to manual focus works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on You only need two filters by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/10/you-only-need-two-filters/#comment-6655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10652#comment-6655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Within a brand, the cheapest is low quality and the most expensive is the high-quality. Unfortunately, this does not really make a good comparison from brand to brand.

Clearly, the best filters are done by reputable companies (There is a lot of research and development involved within the seemingly simple filters; Small companies or companies specializing in &quot;me-too&quot; products usually do not have the R&amp;D power to create a high-quality product). For example, Sunpak, Jessops or Hama are more distributors than designers. Hoya, B&amp;W build some incredibly good filters (and a few cheap ones too).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Within a brand, the cheapest is low quality and the most expensive is the high-quality. Unfortunately, this does not really make a good comparison from brand to brand.</p>
<p>Clearly, the best filters are done by reputable companies (There is a lot of research and development involved within the seemingly simple filters; Small companies or companies specializing in &#8220;me-too&#8221; products usually do not have the R&#038;D power to create a high-quality product). For example, Sunpak, Jessops or Hama are more distributors than designers. Hoya, B&#038;W build some incredibly good filters (and a few cheap ones too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on You only need two filters by Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/10/you-only-need-two-filters/#comment-6654</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10652#comment-6654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is unsurprisingly an interesting post. The title raises a question: how can I tell an high-quality filter from a bad one ? The price could be an indication to eliminate obviously bad/cheap candidates, but that&#039;s definitely not enough. Any advice ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is unsurprisingly an interesting post. The title raises a question: how can I tell an high-quality filter from a bad one ? The price could be an indication to eliminate obviously bad/cheap candidates, but that&#8217;s definitely not enough. Any advice ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Photoshop CS6: a preview of the alpha version by Indigo		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/29/photoshop-cs6-a-preview-of-the-alpha-version/#comment-6651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indigo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8881#comment-6651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seeing the negative comments about content aware I wanted to add my thoughts. Content aware does still work amazingly well and better than what we had before. It is too true that the demo for content aware was just the photoshop team showing off the best of it and not the middle ground as an unbiased demo needs to be, but it is still a tool that I use daily and do not want to be without. I certainly do not think it, as someone working professionally in photo manipulation, that it is a &quot;massive fail&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing the negative comments about content aware I wanted to add my thoughts. Content aware does still work amazingly well and better than what we had before. It is too true that the demo for content aware was just the photoshop team showing off the best of it and not the middle ground as an unbiased demo needs to be, but it is still a tool that I use daily and do not want to be without. I certainly do not think it, as someone working professionally in photo manipulation, that it is a &#8220;massive fail&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Will the Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) save the photo world? by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/09/08/will-the-electronic-viewfinder-evf-save-the-photo-world/#comment-6553</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10967#comment-6553</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Important addition that DPReview just published: Many details &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dpreview.com/news/1109/11090725sonyOLED.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about the &lt;b&gt;OLED viewfinder&lt;/b&gt; from Sony&lt;/a&gt; for the SLT-A77 (or A65) and for the NEX-7.

&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;This is a white OLED display (with a colored filter for each pixel). Easier to manufacture that a multi-color OLED.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;A/D converters are integrated in the display (under the OLED pixels) for higher density and lower digital noise.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Designed and manufactured by Sony.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important addition that DPReview just published: Many details <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/1109/11090725sonyOLED.asp" rel="nofollow">about the <b>OLED viewfinder</b> from Sony</a> for the SLT-A77 (or A65) and for the NEX-7.</p>
<ul>
<li>This is a white OLED display (with a colored filter for each pixel). Easier to manufacture that a multi-color OLED.</li>
<li>A/D converters are integrated in the display (under the OLED pixels) for higher density and lower digital noise.</li>
<li>Designed and manufactured by Sony.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Download Canon EOS 450D manual by Luiz		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/06/26/download-canon-eos-450d-manual/#comment-6536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=3618#comment-6536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the links. Just downloaded from the first link (owner&#039;s manual). Link is fine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links. Just downloaded from the first link (owner&#8217;s manual). Link is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sony announces Alpha 230, Alpha 330 and Alpha 380 by Netherland		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2009/05/18/sony-announces-alpha-230-alpha-330-and-alpha-380/#comment-6529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Netherland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=2857#comment-6529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I bough this lens to replace the original lens on my Sony Alpha 100. That camera came with a lens only 55mm wide. This one lets in a lot more light, which is great for lower light situations. It also zooms over a much longer range and now I don;t need to lug around my telephoto zoom lens all the time anymore. Great lens for the price.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bough this lens to replace the original lens on my Sony Alpha 100. That camera came with a lens only 55mm wide. This one lets in a lot more light, which is great for lower light situations. It also zooms over a much longer range and now I don;t need to lug around my telephoto zoom lens all the time anymore. Great lens for the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Time-lapse videos of North American cities at night by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/08/16/time-lapse-videos-of-north-american-cities-at-night/#comment-6458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10357#comment-6458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PetaPixel proposes an additional video about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petapixel.com/2011/08/11/stunning-time-lapse-portrait-of-la/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Los Angeles&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PetaPixel proposes an additional video about <a href="http://www.petapixel.com/2011/08/11/stunning-time-lapse-portrait-of-la/" rel="nofollow">Los Angeles</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Photoshop CS6: a preview of the alpha version by Stan		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/29/photoshop-cs6-a-preview-of-the-alpha-version/#comment-6449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8881#comment-6449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good, bad, they all cost a lot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, bad, they all cost a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Download the Nikon D7000 user manual by Stan		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/10/21/download-the-nikon-d7000-user-manual/#comment-6448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8288#comment-6448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[O manual Nikon disponível para download em Português: http://nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/pb/D7000_(1R)05.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O manual Nikon disponível para download em Português: <a href="http://nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/pb/D7000_(1R)05.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">http://nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/pb/D7000_(1R)05.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Photoshop CS6: a preview of the alpha version by bryan grant		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/29/photoshop-cs6-a-preview-of-the-alpha-version/#comment-6440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bryan grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8881#comment-6440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[another reason to hand over more $$ to adobe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another reason to hand over more $$ to adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Summary-Analysis of Nikon rumors by Canon 600D		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/22/summary-analysis-of-nikon-rumors/#comment-6437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canon 600D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10718#comment-6437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello! I just would like to give an enormous thumbs up for the wonderful information you have here on this post. I will probably be coming back to your blog for additional soon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I just would like to give an enormous thumbs up for the wonderful information you have here on this post. I will probably be coming back to your blog for additional soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sigma SD1 gets a review by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10625#comment-6333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6325&quot;&gt;Ulf Wittblad&lt;/a&gt;.

Essentially, such comments lead me to 2 reactions: a/ I intend not to remove the (unwelcome) complaint if it does not reach unmanageable levels. b/ Such comments happen and are a reason to question myself anyway.

So I take it personally but in a kind of positive way.

Thanks for your kind words...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6325">Ulf Wittblad</a>.</p>
<p>Essentially, such comments lead me to 2 reactions: a/ I intend not to remove the (unwelcome) complaint if it does not reach unmanageable levels. b/ Such comments happen and are a reason to question myself anyway.</p>
<p>So I take it personally but in a kind of positive way.</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sigma SD1 gets a review by Ulf Wittblad		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulf Wittblad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 08:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10625#comment-6325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t take it personally! The entity that is &quot;Piss off&quot; is one of the reasons the internet will be heavily regulated in the (near?) future :(

Keep up the good work!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t take it personally! The entity that is &#8220;Piss off&#8221; is one of the reasons the internet will be heavily regulated in the (near?) future 🙁</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sigma SD1 gets a review by Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10625#comment-6254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6233&quot;&gt;Piss off&lt;/a&gt;.

Fine comment, for sure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6233">Piss off</a>.</p>
<p>Fine comment, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Sigma SD1 gets a review by Piss off		</title>
		<link>https://www.ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/03/sigma-sd1-gets-a-review/#comment-6233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piss off]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10625#comment-6233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What a shit website!!!!!  Fucking headline and a link stealing some other website&#039;s journalism. Parasitic shits stealing from others.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shit website!!!!!  Fucking headline and a link stealing some other website&#8217;s journalism. Parasitic shits stealing from others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
