<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>YLovePhoto &#187; Sony Alpha 900</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/cat/slr/sony/sony-alpha-900/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en</link>
	<description>Photo intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Best Sony SLR lenses for wildlife photo</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/12/30/best-sony-slr-lenses-for-wildlife-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/12/30/best-sony-slr-lenses-for-wildlife-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony accessories & lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Sony first entered the SLR market in 2006, not many people were sure it would be a successful move for a company with a no significant reputation outside of the compact point-n-shoot world of cameras. However, they drew a bold ace by buying the assets of Konica-Minolta (essentially all SLR photography assets for Minolta). [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Sony first entered the SLR market in 2006, not many people were sure it would be a successful move for a company with a no significant reputation outside of the compact point-n-shoot world of cameras. However, they drew a bold ace by buying the assets of Konica-Minolta (essentially all SLR photography assets for Minolta). This made Sony able to compete in the world of SLR photography using the already existing range of SLR lenses from Minolta.</p>
<div id="attachment_9004" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 432px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/sony_lenses.png" alt="Sony SLR lenses" title="sony_lenses" width="420" height="264" class="size-full wp-image-9004" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony SLR lenses</p></div>
<p>Today, Sony extended this to include the excellent lenses from Carl Zeiss, but it is less significant than the already large set of tele-lenses from Minolta. Actually, this company had designed an impressive set of long focal prime lenses and a nice set of pro zoom lenses.</p>
<p>Wildlife photographers will actually find a wealth of very good quality lenses even if some of them are either second-hand lenses or re-branded Minolta lenses incorporated into the Sony line-up. But the best news for them is that since Sony incorporates Image Stabilization in the body rather than the lenses, all old Minolta glass immediately got IS when used on a Sony SLR camera like the Alpha 700 or the Alpha 900. A real treat for people willing to use second-hand lenses from eBay&#8230;</p>
<h3>Amateur</h3>
<p>If your priority is to keep the total budget at a rock bottom level, there are two interesting lenses to watch for. The first and most impressive one if the 70-400mm f/4-5,6G SAL-70400G. A recent design from Sony, this is widely considered as the best zoom lens of this category (Canon 100-400mm offering is just not as good and Nikon&#8217;s 80-400mm is clearly of lower quality). The price is not small but it gives quite a focal length range.</p>
<div id="attachment_9014" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/800px-Minolta-500mm-Reflex-06.jpg"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/800px-Minolta-500mm-Reflex-06-300x225.jpg" alt="minolta 500mm mirror" title="800px-Minolta-500mm-Reflex-06" width="300" height="225" class="size-medium wp-image-9014" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Minolta 500mm mirror</p></div>
<p>Interestingly, there is another lens that Sony wildlife SLR photographer should also consider: The 500mm f/8 Reflex SAL-500F80 is a mirror (or reflex) lens, so it brings all the good and bad of such a technology.</p>
<p><strong>Good:</strong> Impossibly light 500mm lens (stabilized by the SLR body, of course) with a reasonable quality.</p>
<p><strong>Bad:</strong> The fixed aperture is forcing to choose shutter speed against ISO sensitivity.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus:</strong> While most mirror/reflex lenses do not allow AF, this is the only reflex lens on the market that can auto-focus on all the Alpha-series SLR bodies.</p>
<p>Speaking of cameras, Sony has a large choice (too large?) of SLR cameras. I will risk a recommendation of the Alpha 55. Despite being really flawed for video capture (an overheating sensor is strongly limiting the length of video clips), it offers an excellent 16MP digital APS-C photo sensor with good AF and amazingly fast continuous shooting rates (10 fps) if you can tolerate the ugly electronic viewfinder.</p>
<p>For landscape photography, use the Sony 18-70mm f/3.5-5.6 DT SAL-1870 that will probably come in kit with your camera bosy. This is a bargain.</p>
<p><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alpha_7xx.png"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alpha_7xx.png" alt="alpha_7xx" title="alpha_7xx" width="600" height="341" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5404" /></a></p>
<h3>Enthusiast</h3>
<p>The expert photographer will take advantage of second-hand lenses and this is the real good surprise of the Sony solution for wildlife and nature photographers. Prices can drop significantly here while I recommend taking advantage of the exceptional prime lenses available.</p>
<p>Your first choice must be second-hand since these are only from Minolta: Select the 300mm f/4 APO G and the 400mm f/4,5 APO G (two of the &#8220;white primes&#8221; of the pro G line of Minolta). Relatively light weight and impressively good quality makes these obvious choices. The only real issue is that the 400mm is very rare. You may have to spend some real time looking for it even on eBay. Despite that, prices stay at a reasonable level.</p>
<div id="attachment_9015" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 319px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/minolta_white_APO_lenses.png" alt="Minolta APO white lenses" title="minolta_white_APO_lenses" width="309" height="466" class="size-full wp-image-9015" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Minolta APO white prime lenses</p></div>
<p>Quite significantly, all the APO G tele-lenses have been designed by Minolta with the focal multipliers in mind, to the point that the focal doubler doesn&#8217;t degrade images as much as doublers for Canon or Nikon brands). I recommend strongly the 1,4x multiplier from Sony (or the older Minolta branded if it is a mint-quality second-hand).</p>
<p>Currently, Sony problem is that there is no SLR body that can seriously be recommended here: The Alpha 55 electronic viewfinder will not satisfy any of the enthusiast photographers. The only reasonable choice is between the Alpha 850 (or Alpha 900) and the upcoming/promised replacement for the Alpha 700. A full frame SLR like the A850/A900 is tempting because of its exceptionally good price (under 2000$) but you will loose the focal extension provided by APS-C sensors while the A850/A900 are not very reactive (relatively slow AF and limited continuous shooting). The Alpha 700 is still a good camera at a very good price, but it is now ready for a replacement in 2011. If Sony does not install in it one of their (successful but ugly) electronic viewfinders, the Alpha 750 (tentative name) will be a better choice.</p>
<p>Complementing the initial prime tele-lenses, you would add a Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 ZA Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* SAL-2470Z (same as before) and possibly a Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* SAL-1635ZA. Both are expensive and heavy gear, but you can&#8217;t get any better.</p>
<p>In between, a Konica Minolta 200mm f/2.8 APO G AF would be a nice complement for a relatively short tele lens.</p>
<h3>Pro</h3>
<p>Unfortunately, Sony does not provide a perfect solution set at the pro level. The camera body choice will be limited by the same constraints as above for the expert/enthusiast (either A850/A900 or future A750). 2011 may also bring a new pro-level SLR camera body but nothing is really certain here.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the long prime lens choice is relatively easy: Go for the Sony 300mm f/2.8 G SAL-300F28G which has all the bells and whistles of the top-quality glass deriving from the original Minolta design updated to the latest standards (including SSM smooth focus).</p>
<p>While you could keep the good old Minolta 400mm f/4,5 APO G previously mentioned, I am sure you are thinking about a 500mm. Unfortunately, while Sony has been showing models, we are still waiting for this lens (probably in February 2011). Quality should be there, since price and weight will be no issue.</p>
<p>As for the expert, before, these tele-lenses will be complemented with a Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 ZA Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* SAL-2470Z and a Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T* SAL-1635ZA. I would also add the pro-level (G-series) Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 G SAL-70200G zoom lens, for its quality and its SSM focus.</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Really, Sony takes full advantage of the existing Minolta line-up of lenses. For example, the Minolta 400mm f/4,5 APO G is simply impressive for a cost usually under 2000$ and a weight compatible with most back-packs.</p>
<p>However, the mix of new technologies and relative lack of understanding of pro photographer needs for the SLR camera bodies, puts Sony is a dire position. It is no surprise that, currently, Sony cameras are not often seen in the bags of photo-safari travelers.</p>
<p>However, the arrival of new 2011 SLR bodies and of a world-class 500mm f/4 prime lens could gradually change this.</p>
<p>In between, Since we don&#8217;t often see wildlife photographers equipped with Sony gear, here is a David Bittner video clip where you may find some of the lenses lenses and camera bodies listed above. Will you be able to recognize the 300mm f/2.8 lens or the 70-200mm zoom?</p>
<p><center><object width="604" height="365"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/y-IdYcL5BQg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/y-IdYcL5BQg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x402061&amp;color2=0x9461ca" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="604" height="365"></embed></object><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-IdYcL5BQg&#038;feature=player_embedded">YouTube link</a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/12/30/best-sony-slr-lenses-for-wildlife-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New firmware for Sony Alpha 850/900: Tomorrow Now confirmed</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/30/new-firmware-for-sony-alpha-850900-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/30/new-firmware-for-sony-alpha-850900-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firmwares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[photo © 2010 yellowcloud &#124; more info (via: Wylio) Update: This is now confirmed and the firmware can be downloaded freely. According to SonyAlphaRumors.com, Sony will present tomorrow a new version of the firmware for the Sony Alpha 850 and 900 SLR Full Frame photo cameras. It should bring: Faster Autofocus Maximum exposure compensation range: [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="wylio-flickr-image-4524769415" style="display:block;line-height:15px;width:330px;padding:0;margin:0 10px;position:relative;float:right;"><img style="padding:0;margin:0;border:none;" width="330" height="220" src="http://img.wylio.com/flickr/330/4524769415" title="256kbit/16kbit EPROM/SRAM Wafer Scale Integration PSD311 - photo by: yellowcloud, Source: Flickr, found with Wylio.com" alt="256kbit/16kbit EPROM/SRAM Wafer Scale Integration PSD311" /><span class="wylio-credits" id="wylio-flickr-credits-4524769415" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;padding:0;margin:0;width:100%;color:#aaa;background:#fff;float:left;clear:both;font-size:11px;font-style:italic;"><span class="photoby" style="padding:2px; margin:0;"><span style="display:block;float:left;margin:0;padding0;" >photo © 2010 <a style="padding:0;margin:0;color:#aaa; text-decoration:underline;" target="_blank" title="click to visit the Flickr profile page for yellowcloud" href="http://www.flickr.com/people/63794141@N00">yellowcloud</a> | <a style="padding:0;margin:0;color:#aaa; text-decoration:underline;" title="get more information about the photo '256kbit/16kbit EPROM/SRAM Wafer Scale Integration PSD311'" target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/63794141@N00/4524769415">more info </a></span><span style="display:block;float:right;margin-left:5px;"><strong style="margin:0;padding0;">(via: <a style="padding:0;margin:0;color:#aaa; text-decoration:underline;" target="_blank" href="http://wylio.com" title="free pictures">Wylio</a>)</strong></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><strong>Update: This is now confirmed and the firmware can be downloaded freely.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr5-exclusive-on-sonyalpharumors-the-sony-a850900-firmware-upgrade-press-release-and-powerpoint-presentation/">According to SonyAlphaRumors.com</a>, Sony will present tomorrow a new version of the firmware for the Sony Alpha 850 and 900 SLR Full Frame photo cameras. It should bring:</p>
<ul>
<li>Faster Autofocus</li>
<li>Maximum exposure compensation range: Increased from ±3EV to ±5EV</li>
<li>Increased exposure bracketing range for HDR: from a maximum of 4.0EV (three shots at -2EV, 0EV, +2EV) to a maximum of 6.0EV (-3EV, 0EV, +3EV).</li>
<li>Shutter release, even when the camera body doesn’t detect an attached lens.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://support.sony-europe.com/dime/DSLR/dslr.aspx">Download the new (free) firmware</a> from Sony. <s>As soon as it is available.</s> Right now!</p>
<p>The direct link: <a href="http://support.sony-europe.com/dime/downloads/downloads.aspx?site=odw_fr_FR&#038;f=FW_DSLR_A850_A900_V2_WIN_MAC&#038;m=DSLR-A850">http://support.sony-europe.com/dime/downloads/downloads.aspx?site=odw_fr_FR&#038;f=FW_DSLR_A850_A900_V2_WIN_MAC&#038;m=DSLR-A850</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/30/new-firmware-for-sony-alpha-850900-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>24MP/FF for Nikon and Sony</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/05/24mpff-for-nikon-and-sony/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/05/24mpff-for-nikon-and-sony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 950]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[photo credit: Edur8 There is currently a Full Frame digital sensor being developed by Sony. Or more precisely, Sony currently works on a 24 mega-pixel technology in the Full Frame form factor (FX in the Nikon local language) and the two applications actually forecast are at Nikon for building the Nikon D800 and at Sony [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="left_box"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30311937@N05/2840744909/" title="Sensor" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2275/2840744909_0b0f96b164.jpg" alt="Sensor" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" title="Attribution License" target="_blank"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30311937@N05/2840744909/" title="Edur8" target="_blank">Edur8</a></small></div>
<p>There is currently a Full Frame digital sensor being developed by Sony. Or more precisely, Sony currently works on a 24 mega-pixel technology in the Full Frame form factor (FX in the Nikon local language) and the two applications actually forecast are at Nikon for building the <a href="/en/cat/reflex/nikon/nikon-d800/">Nikon D800</a> and at Sony for the successor of the <a href="/en/cat/reflex/sony/sony-alpha-850/">Alpha 850</a> and <a href="/en/cat/reflex/sony/sony-alpha-900/">Alpha 900</a> (the name has certainly not been fixed right now). I&#8217;m told that there is also another brand talking to Sony right now about the opportunity to share this technology (another 24 MP in Full Frame clothes).</p>
<p>For the time being, it seems that (faithful to the Nikon tradition- the Sony digital sensor will be modified according to the needs of the yellow brand. It&#8217;s true that Nikon is never perfectly satisfied with what Sony offers in terms of sensors (but that the sensor core does not change, justifying completely the &#8220;same sensor as&#8230;&#8221; mention often repeated in the past around this issue) but that Nikon does not totally share the intensity of the Sony commitment for video in this part (the high-end) of the camera range.</p>
<p>Right now, Sony works to optimize the digital sensor sensitivity (given a Full Frame surface size, they try to bring the best image quality, the lowest digital noise and the highest ISO sensitivity). According to the data we got here, the cameras based upon this new digital sensor would be announced at the end of Summer 2011 with availability in the last quarter of 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/05/24mpff-for-nikon-and-sony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D800: Possible features</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/09/20/nikon-d800-possible-features/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/09/20/nikon-d800-possible-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 820]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 950]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=7772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the leaks have been collected by our friends of Reportages Photo and they may allow us to discover some of the features of the next Nikon D800 (some believe that it will replace the existing Nikon D700, FX Full Frame photo camera famous for its excellent sensitivity coming from using a reasonably low resolution [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the leaks have been collected by <a href="http://www.reportagesphotos.fr/A2246-nikon-d800-les-premieres-caracteristiques-du-rempla-ant-du-nikon-d700.html">our friends of Reportages Photo</a> and they may allow us to discover some of the features of the next <strong>Nikon D800</strong> (some believe that it will replace the existing <a href="/en/slr/nikon/nikon-d700">Nikon D700</a>, FX Full Frame photo camera famous for its excellent sensitivity coming from using a reasonably low resolution to get very wide pixels).</p>
<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/nikon_d800_leak.jpg" alt="Nikon D800 leak" title="nikon_d800_leak" width="280" height="210" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7394" /></p>
<p>As a matter of fact, an online Chinese eCommerce web site published a product page for the Nikon D800. A photo, some features somewhat far from what is expected from Nikon, but after all, why not?</p>
<p>First and foremost, the resolution would (fast) climb to 24 MP, or near to the current maximum for Full Frame digital sensors, indicating a possible use of the Full Frame photo sensor from Sony (already used on Sony <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-900">Alpha 900</a> and <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-850">Alpha 850</a>, but with some video-capture ability added).</p>
<p>Next, we find a shutter with speeds from 30s to 1/8000s for continuous bursts of 7 frames/second, video recording in 720p and 1080p, ISO 200-6400 (ext. to ISO 100-25600) light sensitivity, exposure metering using a 1005-RGB-point sensor and system, Nikon Multi-CAM 3500FX AF 51-point AF system, a fixed LCD screen attached to the back of the camera with a 3&#8243; (7,5 cm) LCD with 921.000 pixels.</p>
<p>Clearly, this would build a relatively easy to predict kind of camera (apart from the high resolution of the sensor which would indicate Nikon is leaving the lonely track of low resolution Full Frame to go and catch up with Canon and Sony where they already succeed).</p>
<p>But this is still surprising. If this is more than an unfounded rumour, it will allow a prediction of the direction Sony is taking in terms of FF sensors and the successor to the Sony <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-900">Alpha 900</a> and <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-850">Alpha 850</a> would keep their resolution at 24 MP while video capture would be added like on the Nikon D800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/09/20/nikon-d800-possible-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small programs for big ISO</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/08/20/small-programs-for-big-isos/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/08/20/small-programs-for-big-isos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Image edit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 330]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 550]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accentuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACDSee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aperture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibble Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Raw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capture One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dcraw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DxO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightzone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silkypix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=6366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many French-speaking lovers of the Sony (ex-Minolta) photo cameras know about the excellent web site of Alpha Numérique which is providing a wealth of varied informations (often appearing in the link lists I publish monthly in relation with photo software programs). Eiffel Tower, by night &#8211; Copyright (C) Yves Roumazeilles Now, I would like to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many French-speaking lovers of the Sony (ex-Minolta) photo cameras know about the excellent web site of <a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/">Alpha Numérique</a> which is providing a wealth of varied informations (often appearing in the link lists I publish monthly in relation with photo software programs).</p>
<div class="right_box"><a href="http://www.roumazeilles.net/images/Eiffel1.jpg"><img src="http://www.roumazeilles.net/images/Eiffel1.jpg" width=350 height=525 alt="Eiffel Tower, by night - Copyright (C) Yves Roumazeilles" /></a>
<p>Eiffel Tower, by night &#8211; Copyright (C) <a href="http://www.roumazeilles.net/photo/fr/paris_by_night.php">Yves Roumazeilles</a></div>
<p>Now, I would like to underline the quality of a full series of posts, published by Patrick Moll on Alpha Numérique, and dedicated to comparing as precisely as possible the various offers now on the market to develop and improve as much as possible the pictures that -sometimes- we must shoot using very high levels of ISO sensitivity (with the troubling levels of digital noise that come with big ISO levels).</p>
<p>The list of the software programs taken into account is quite respectable:</p>
<ul>
<li>Image Data Converter 3</li>
<li>Lightroom 3 / Camera Raw 6</li>
<li>DxO Optics Pro 6</li>
<li>Aperture 3</li>
<li>Bibble Pro 5</li>
<li>Capture One Pro 5</li>
<li>ACDSee Pro 3</li>
<li>Silkypix 4</li>
<li>Lightzone 3</li>
<li>Raw Developer 1 (dcraw)</li>
</ul>
<p>Not bad, eh!</p>
<p>Even if the comparisons done here are <strong>not only for Sony photo cameras</strong>, Patrick Moll applied its tests to a quite appreciable list of cameras too:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=484:comparatif-de-logiciels-a-hauts-iso-3-sony-alpha-100&#038;catid=70:comparatifs&#038;Itemid=321">A100</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=495:comparatif-de-logiciels-a-hauts-iso-4-sony-alpha-550&#038;catid=70:comparatifs&#038;Itemid=321">A550</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=509:comparatif-de-logiciels-a-hauts-iso-5-sony-alpha-700&#038;catid=70:comparatifs&#038;Itemid=321">A700</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=536:comparatif-de-logiciels-a-hauts-iso-6-sony-alpha-900&#038;catid=70:comparatifs&#038;Itemid=321">A900</a></li>
<li>A330 (not ready yet when I published this post)</li>
</ul>
<p>Even if you are not reading French, I highly recommend checking these (most of the posts are made of image comparisons using the yellow buttons to select the software program results you want to see). Even if you are equipped with Pentax, Canon or Nikon gear, the lessons you will draw from this are applicable on all the photo camera brands, concerning strengths and weaknesses of each of these software tools.</p>
<p>To understand the review process and the methodology, I would recommend the reading of (here, all <em>in French</em>):</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=475:comparatif-de-logiciels-a-hauts-iso-1-introduction&#038;catid=70:comparatifs&#038;Itemid=321">Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.alpha-numerique.fr/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=476:comparatif-de-logiciels-a-hauts-iso-2-reduction-du-bruit-et-accentuation&#038;catid=70:comparatifs&#038;Itemid=321">Réduction du bruit et accentuation</a></li>
</ul>
<p>With the tests, body by body, you will immediately recognize the excellent results of Lightroom 3/Camera Raw 6 (these two Adobe software programs share a single common RAW file management core). Just behind, comes DxO Optics Pro 6 which is a bit more violent (or more accentuation prone) and the (not famous enough) Bibble Pro 5.</p>
<p>From this point, you will always be able to get the best from the photos you were forced into shooting in poor lighting conditions which required big ISO figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/08/20/small-programs-for-big-isos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photokina 2010: Sony reborn</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/07/22/photokina-2010-sony-reborn/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/07/22/photokina-2010-sony-reborn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 33]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 55]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 560]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 580]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 790]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 820]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 950]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony NEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pellix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photokina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=6197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 is decidedly a critical year for Sony: Nearly all the photography product portfolio is going to be renewed and many innovations are coming to sustain this. Even better, at the end of September, the Photokina fair in Köln, Germany, will allow Sony to announce and present several key products defining this rebirth, this jump [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 is decidedly a critical year for Sony: Nearly all the photography product portfolio is going to be renewed and many innovations are coming to sustain this. Even better, at the end of September, the Photokina fair in Köln, Germany, will allow Sony to announce and present several key products defining this rebirth, this jump ahead.</p>
<div class="left_box"><object width="300" height="193"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/jxJiJH1YsrQ&amp;hl=fr_FR&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/jxJiJH1YsrQ&amp;hl=fr_FR&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="300" height="193"></embed></object></div>
<p>First, and this is very easy to predict, Sony is ready to add to its NEX range of photo cameras. Already noticed because of the originality of its concept (a very dense point-and-shoot-like body, very simple but able to hold not only the new lenses of the new NEX range, but also compatible with the existing Alpha lenses, to bring light onto an APS-C CMOS digital photo sensor brought in the Alpha SLR range). While NEX was received with an obvious interest, it still needs to prove that it fills the needs of a real public. And this may be easier when a few days before the Photokina show (in September) we will be able to see the new photo camera of the NEX range: The NEX-7, which <a href="http://eoshd.com/content.php?183-Sony-NEX7-to-rival-GH2-in-September">should capture 1080p video</a> up to 60 frames/s. This should bring it in direct competition with the Panasonic GH2 which is still the best digital video offer among the compact photo cameras.</p>
<div class="right35_box">
<p>Caractéristiques du NEX-7:</p>
<ul>
<li>14MP CMOS sensor</li>
<li>Full manual control</li>
<li>1080p @ 60 fps</li>
<li>1080p @ 24 fps</li>
<li>720p @ 120 fps &#038; 60 fps/li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>On top of it, we already know that Sony just presented it NEX-VG10 video camera, which is the pure video solution in the NEX range (again with the same CMOS 14.2 MP digital sensor that Sony seems decided to apply to as many NEX and Alpha cameras as marketingly possible). Available in September (in parallel with the door opening of the Photokina), it will be sold around $2000 (probably a little less than 2000€ on the old E continent).</p>
<p>Of course, Sony will also present (and possibly make immediately available) some new NEX lenses. The one whose name is most often repeated, since the <a href="http://">Yodobashi</a> leak in May, is the Sony NEX 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 OSS.</p>
<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/images/logo/sony.png" height=51 width=267 align="right">Then, there is no need of a crystal ball to announce that Sony will speak a lot about 3D on the Photokina floor. All the company divisions (video games, movies, video, photography) have been committed to bring active product support to this technology defined as a key target for Sony. </p>
<p>But, will you say, where are the D-SLR here? I kept the finest morsel for this part of the meal I offer you. Sony is preparing a full overhaul of its Alpha range. The A290 and A390 are already here with a 14.2 MP sensor (but only in a-little-outdated CCD technology), here comes the flood. There&#8217;s no doubt that the successor of the Sony Alpha 700 is ready. It was nearly official in PMA 2010 (at the beginning of 2010):</p>
<p><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alpha_7xx.png"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alpha_7xx.png" alt="alpha_7xx" title="alpha_7xx" width="600" height="341" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5404" /></a></p>
<p>I dream of having reliable information about its photo sensor, but it is nearly certain that it won&#8217;t be the ubiquitous 14MP CMOS sensor of NEX and A500 series. It will be an APS-C sensor capable of 1080p video capture at 30 fps (at least). Since Sony always repeated that they would never bring a photo camera with a half-thought video section (like some of the competition, they murmur), it will be worth looking into its detailed features. Moreover, I would bet a tidy sum that the camera will be named <strong>Alpha 750</strong>, even if it appears that A790 was a possibility during the design stage.</p>
<p>The Sony press photo for PMA2010 (above) also gave us an important bit of information: The Sony Alpha 750 will have a little brother also video capable (probably with a resolution limited to 14 MP). The rumor says &#8211;curiously enough&#8211; that it would be named Alpha 33, and I find this utterly surprising. We&#8217;ll see, but in the meantime, you could listen to what the Spanish <a href="http://www.dslrmagazine.com/digital/camaras-evf/sony-y-el-pellicle-mirror-2.html">DSLRmagazine</a> has to say about its supposed semi-transparent mirror used to assist a good autofocus in LiveView mode (<font size="-3"><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&#038;prev=_t&#038;hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;layout=1&#038;eotf=1&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dslrmagazine.com%2Fdigital%2Fcamaras-evf%2Fsony-y-el-pellicle-mirror-2.html&#038;sl=es&#038;tl=fr">traduction française</a>, <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&#038;sl=es&#038;tl=en&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dslrmagazine.com%2Fdigital%2Fcamaras-evf%2Fsony-y-el-pellicle-mirror-2.html">English translation</a></font>).</p>
<div id="attachment_6244" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 248px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/alpha-950.jpg" alt="Sony Alpha 950?" title="alpha-950" width="238" height="249" class="size-full wp-image-6244" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Sony Alpha 950?</p></div>
<p>But there is another possibility to take into account. According to <em>Réponses Photo</em>, the French magazine, &#8220;Sony give [us] a rendezvous in September for other SLR news, but this time in the <strong>expert</strong> and <strong>pro</strong> ranges&#8230;&#8221; (emphasis is mine). It looks a lot like a leak out of a magazine already informed but held tight by the signing of an NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement). It would seem very surprising that anybody knowledgeable would place the Sony Alpha 750 in the &#8220;pro&#8221; range, it is the &#8220;expert&#8221; announcement. But, the, here is the last event: A pro camera! The Sony Alpha 900 (and its little brother A850) would prepare itself for a new offspring in the use of an <strong>Alpha 950</strong> (no certainty about the name, of course)! And that could be thunderous if they announced (availability in early 2011?) the new 32 MP Full Frame CMOS sensor in association with a new quad-core BIONZ processor (aka <em>Quattro Bionz</em>).</p>
<p>The other option in this part of the product lien would be the arrival of an Alpha 820 (this name is heard in several mouths right now) which would be a new effort to popularize the Alpha 900 after the sub-2000€ Alpha 850. Credibility: Very low in my (not so) humble opinion.</p>
<p>You will have noticed that I did not go heavy on the conditional tense despite the long list of news. Be prepraed to see a Sony showroom of enormous size and density in Köln, next September for the Photokina. Alpha, NEX, 3D, video, Sony is alive and kicking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/07/22/photokina-2010-sony-reborn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing the Alpha 900 in Antartica</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/02/24/testing-the-alpha-900-in-antartica/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/02/24/testing-the-alpha-900-in-antartica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D MkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antartica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=5360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[photo credit: Javier Paredes You have to admit that you would like to know if the first Sony SLR camera supposed to be a pro photo camera, the Sony Alpha 900, is really up to the real-life constraints of a pro camera. Some people would really test it: Michael Reichmann from Luminous Landscape, simply took [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="right_box"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11701129@N00/3540220218/" title="IMG_5103" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2043/3540220218_61873a84e3_m.jpg" alt="IMG_5103" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" title="Attribution-ShareAlike License" target="_blank"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/11701129@N00/3540220218/" title="Javier Paredes" target="_blank">Javier Paredes</a></small></div>
<p>You have to admit that you would like to know if the first Sony SLR camera supposed to be a pro photo camera, the <a href="/en/slr/sony-alpha-900">Sony Alpha 900</a>, is really up to the real-life constraints of a pro camera. Some people would really test it: Michael Reichmann from <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/">Luminous Landscape</a>, simply took a Sony Alpha 900, a Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G tele-zoom and 5 other lenses, for two weeks of photo travel in the Southernmost countries of this world. Result: A rather positive opinion, no real issue after submitting the photo camera to low temperatures and high humidity that were out of its normal operating range.</p>
<p>He also noted the incidents other cameras suffered around him (no less than 77 other photographers!). For example, the <a href="/en/slr/canon-eos-5d-mkii">Canon EOS 5D MkII</a> which did not survive in cold rain.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/antarctica-2009-worked.shtml">The Sony A900 test in Antartica</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/02/24/testing-the-alpha-900-in-antartica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird: Alpha 707 and Alpha 900SH</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/02/12/weird-alpha-707-and-alpha-900sh/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/02/12/weird-alpha-707-and-alpha-900sh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 820]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=5340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are waiting impatiently for the launch of new SLR photo cameras from Sony, but here is the weirdest rumour seen in China about this. A Sony Alpha 707 with HD video capture and ISO 12.800 sensitivity and a Sony Alpha 900SH with HD video. Seriously! I can&#8217;t believe it for a moment&#8230; It&#8217;s so [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are waiting impatiently for the launch of new SLR photo cameras from Sony, but here is the weirdest rumour seen in China about this. </p>
<div id="attachment_5157" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 600px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/sony-alpha-rumors-alpha_707-and-alpha_900SH.jpg" alt="Improbable : Sony Alpha 707 &amp; Sony Alpha 900SH" title="sony-alpha-rumors-alpha_707-and-alpha_900SH" width="590" height="428" class="size-full wp-image-5157" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Improbable : Sony Alpha 707 &#038; Sony Alpha 900SH</p></div>
<p>A Sony Alpha 707 with HD video capture and ISO 12.800 sensitivity and a Sony Alpha 900SH with HD video.</p>
<p>Seriously! I can&#8217;t believe it for a moment&#8230; It&#8217;s so strange that I will not even create the Sony Alpha 7007 and Sony Alpha 900SH categories for the YLovePhoto menus.</p>
<p>Thanks to Mash for the link to <a href="http://photorumors.com/2010/02/09/new-pentax-lenses/">PR</a>. These guys are ready for any kind of rumour&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/02/12/weird-alpha-707-and-alpha-900sh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Frame comparison</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/03/04/full-frame-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/03/04/full-frame-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D MkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=1804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo, the gadget blog, sometimes has a few interesting posts about digital photography. Today, this is the case with their &#8220;Canon 5D Mark II vs. Nikon D700 Review Shoot-Out&#8221; which turned out to face the two digital cameras in real-life conditions of night photo (of course, they wanted to compare high-ISO pictures and noise).]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gizmodo, the gadget blog, sometimes has a few interesting posts about digital photography. Today, this is the case with their &#8220;<a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5160540/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-review-shoot+out">Canon 5D Mark II vs. Nikon D700 Review Shoot-Out</a>&#8221; which turned out to face the two digital cameras in real-life conditions of night photo (of course, they wanted to compare high-ISO pictures and noise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/03/04/full-frame-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More reviews for the FF cameras</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/01/28/more-reviews-for-the-ff-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/01/28/more-reviews-for-the-ff-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D MkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am quite impressed, I keep receiving more and more reviews for the Full Frame SLR cameras of this winter. It seems that the interest is very high. Currently: Nikon D3x: 15 reviews Canon EOS 5D Mk II: 21 reviews Sony Alpha 900: 21 reviews Nikon D700: 16 reviews A lot of reading for those [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite impressed, I keep receiving more and more reviews for the Full Frame SLR cameras of this winter. It seems that the interest is very high. Currently:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/slr/nikon-d3x/">Nikon D3x</a>: 15 reviews</li>
<li><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/slr/canon-eos-5d-mkii/">Canon EOS 5D Mk II</a>: 21 reviews</li>
<li><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/slr/sony-alpha-900/">Sony Alpha 900</a>: 21 reviews</li>
<li><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/slr/nikon-d700/">Nikon D700</a>: 16 reviews</li>
</ul>
<p>A lot of reading for those who are either ready to shell several grands on a Full Frame SLR camera or are still waiting to get a new camera in a few years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/01/28/more-reviews-for-the-ff-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
