<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>YLovePhoto &#187; Nikon D700</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/cat/slr/nikon/nikon-d700/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en</link>
	<description>Photo intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon batteries on fire!</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/04/27/nikon-batteries-on-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/04/27/nikon-batteries-on-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or, rather, there is a risk of overheating and Nikon decided not to take any risk and to recall some of the EN-EL15 (batteries used on D700, D7000, D800, D800E and V1). The only batteries that may be replaced hold the letter E or the letter F in 9th position in their serial number. EN-EL15 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, rather, there is a risk of overheating and Nikon decided not to take any risk and to recall some of the EN-EL15 (batteries used on D700, D7000, D800, D800E and V1).</p>
<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Nikon-en-el15-battery-recall.png" alt="" title="Nikon-en-el15-battery-recall" width="500" height="385" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11950" /></p>
<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Nikon-en-el15-serial-number-EN.jpg" alt="" title="Nikon-en-el15-serial-number-EN" width="420" height="204" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11724" /></p>
<p>The only batteries that may be replaced hold the letter E or the letter F in 9th position in their serial number.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Service-And-Support/Service-Advisories/h0ndzaip/EN-EL15-Battery-Recall-Service-Advisory.html">EN-EL15 Rechargeable Li-ion Battery Service Advisory</a> (Nikon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/04/27/nikon-batteries-on-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough fight: 5D MkIII vs. D800</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/04/26/tough-fight-5d-mkiii-vs-d800/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/04/26/tough-fight-5d-mkiii-vs-d800/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D MkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D MkIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that we would like to see a clear comparison between two significant cameras when we see them. We want to compare them despite their different brands, or we want to compare to older and more expensive and less expensive models. We are not alone. Plenty of people on the web have the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that we would like to see a clear comparison between two significant cameras when we see them. We want to compare them despite their different brands, or we want to compare to older and more expensive and less expensive models.</p>
<p>We are not alone. Plenty of people on the web have the same objective and they brought us exactly that: A wealth of comparisons, parallel tests and face-to-face reviews for the newest contenders for the title of &#8220;Most attractive enthusiast-targeting photo camera with a Full Frame sensor&#8221;.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.petapixel.com/2012/04/24/low-light-comparison-of-the-canon-5d-mark-ii-5d-mark-iii-and-nikon-d800/">Low Light Comparison of the Canon 5D Mark II, 5D Mark III, and Nikon D800</a> from Joe Marine (via PetaPixel): It&#8217;s an impressive show of the Canon video performance (even calling the old 5D MkII in) <iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/40113110?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ff0179" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></li>
<li>DxOLabs does a number of reviews and comparisons aiming at the sensor quality (<a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Nikon-D800-Review/Sensor-performance">D800</a> &#038; <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Publications/DxOMark-Reviews/Canon-5D-Mark-III-Review/Sensor-performance">5D MkIII</a>): does not leave any doubt about the photo ability of the Nikon sensor (or should I say Sony sensor?).</li>
<p><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CS_Nikon_D800_vs_Nikon_D4.jpg"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CS_Nikon_D800_vs_Nikon_D4.jpg" alt="" title="CS_Nikon_D800_vs_Nikon_D4" width="489" height="474" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11712" /></a><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CS_Canon_EOS_5D_mark_III_vs_Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II.jpg"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CS_Canon_EOS_5D_mark_III_vs_Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II.jpg" alt="" title="CS_Canon_EOS_5D_mark_III_vs_Canon_EOS_5D_Mark_II" width="491" height="475" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-11711" /></a></p>
<li><a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2012/04/10/nikon-d800-vs-d3s-and-d7000-comparison-by-cary-jordan.aspx/">Nikon D800 vs. D3s and D7000 comparison</a> by Cary Jordan: is obviously impressed by the D800 performance (as an excellent FX camera and as a very good DX/APS-C camera, too.)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.photoanswers.co.uk/News/Search-Results/Magazine-News/Digital-Photo-News/Canon-EOS-5D-Mk-III-Vs-Nikon-D800/">Canon EOS 5D Mk III Vs Nikon D800</a> at PhotoAnswers: is rather balanced but shows very nice D800 pictures.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/04/26/tough-fight-5d-mkiii-vs-d800/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D300s and D700 are at the end of the road</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/01/28/nikon-d300s-and-d700-are-at-the-end-of-the-road/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/01/28/nikon-d300s-and-d700-are-at-the-end-of-the-road/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=11373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weird! On their Japanese web site (but not on the French or US web sites, or nay other Nikon web site I could check), Nikon just lightened the list of its discontinued DSLR photo cameras: Nobody&#8217;s really surprised by the presence of the Nikon D700 since Nikon will announce its successor the Nikon D800 as [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird! On their <a href="http://www.nikon-image.com/products/discontinue/camera/">Japanese web site</a> (but not on the French or US web sites, or nay other Nikon web site I could check), Nikon just lightened the list of its discontinued DSLR photo cameras:</p>
<div id="attachment_11527" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 587px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/d300s_d700_finis.gif" alt="" title="d300s_d700_done" width="577" height="214" class="size-full wp-image-11527" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D300s and Nikon D700, it&#039;s the end</p></div>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s really surprised by the presence of the Nikon D700 since <a href="http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/11/20/nikon-d800-sony-sensors-hit-again/">Nikon will announce</a> its successor the <a href="/en/cat/nikon/nikon-d800/">Nikon D800</a> as soon as the beginning of next month (probably on February 7th).</p>
<p>On the contrary, if many people (like me) are waiting impatiently the successor to the Nikon D300s which started to look old; Despite its qualities, the competition progressed a lot in the last two years.</p>
<p>So, is this announcing the demise of the D300s and the presentation of a new Nikon D400 in February? At first, some thought it could be an error (!) but after more than 24 hours on site, the <em>error</em> seems to be here to stay. But we are clearly out of rumors about the <a href="/en/cat/nikon/nikon-d400/">Nikon D400</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2012/01/28/nikon-d300s-and-d700-are-at-the-end-of-the-road/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summary-Analysis of Nikon rumors</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/22/summary-analysis-of-nikon-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/22/summary-analysis-of-nikon-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D400]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D4x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Summer heat (in the Northern hemisphere) starts to have a heavy influence on our dreams of holidays and on our ability to think clearly, we are more and more to wonder what Nikon is preparing us: The launch of the Nikon D7000 is now far in the past in mid-2010, the entry-level range is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/50-nikon-lenses.jpg" alt="" title="50-nikon-lenses" width="466" height="500" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-10765" />While Summer heat (in the Northern hemisphere) starts to have a heavy influence on our dreams of holidays and on our ability to think clearly, we are more and more to wonder what Nikon is preparing us: The launch of the Nikon D7000 is now far in the past in mid-2010, the entry-level range is well stocked with the D3100 and D5100 now really available on the shelves. But, in the highest part of the range, everything seems calm on the Western front for the yellow logo Japanese brand. But there is nearly no reliable, solid, trustful information.</p>
<p>So, can we try and build a summary of what is known and what the Nikon-lovers must know and understand if they are waiting for their next dream photo camera?</p>
<p>The first thing to notice is clearly the way Digital SLR photo cameras ran one after the other in the Nikon range of cameras. I dare say that I borrowed a camera <em>Timeline</em> built by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nikon_DSLR_cameras">Wikipedia</a> (See below). This historical approach based on the record of launch dates allows to better perceive how Nikon usually operates:</p>
<ul>
<li>Entry-level photo cameras replaced at high frequency</li>
<li>A much quieter Pro-level range</li>
</ul>
<table width="100%" border="5" bordercolorlight="#CCCCCC" bordercolordark="#666666" class="std_box">
<tr style="font-weight:bold">
<td colspan="2" rowspan="2" style="width:11em"></td>
<td colspan="4">2005</td>
<td colspan="4">2006</td>
<td colspan="4">2007</td>
<td colspan="4">2008</td>
<td colspan="4">2009</td>
<td colspan="4">2010</td>
<td colspan="3">2011</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-weight:bold">
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>2</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4"><small><b>Professional</b></small></td>
<td rowspan="2"><small><b>Flagship</b></small></td>
<td colspan="5" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D2X" title="Nikon D2X">D2X</a></td>
<td colspan="5" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D2X#Nikon_D2Xs" title="Nikon D2X">D2Xs</a></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td colspan="12" style="background:#b0ffb0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D3X" title="Nikon D3X">D3X</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D2H#D2Hs" title="Nikon D2H">D2Hs</a></td>
<td colspan="9" style="background:#b0ffb0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D3" title="Nikon D3">D3</a></td>
<td colspan="8" style="background:#b0ffb0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D3S" title="Nikon D3S"><u><span style="border-bottom: 1px double #000; border-color:{{{2}}}">D3S</span></u></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2"><small><b>Compact</b></small></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td colspan="13" style="background:#b0ffb0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D700" title="Nikon D700">D700</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D100" title="Nikon D100">D100</a></td>
<td colspan="7" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D200" title="Nikon D200">D200</a></td>
<td colspan="8" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D300" title="Nikon D300">D300</a></td>
<td colspan="9" style="background:#b0ffb0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D300S" title="Nikon D300S"><u><span style="border-bottom: 1px double #000; border-color:{{{2}}}">D300S</span></u></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4"><small><b>Consumer</b></small></td>
<td rowspan="2"><small><b>Advanced</b></small></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="2"></td>
<td colspan="5" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D7000" title="Nikon D7000"><u><span style="border-bottom: 1px double #000; border-color:{{{2}}}">D7000</span></u></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background:#e0e0e0">&nbsp;</td>
<td colspan="5" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D70#D70s" title="Nikon D70">D70s</a></td>
<td colspan="8" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D80" title="Nikon D80">D80</a></td>
<td colspan="12" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D90" title="Nikon D90"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">D90</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1"><small><b>Mid-range</b></small></td>
<td colspan="1"></td>
<td colspan="6" style="background:#e0e0e0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D50" title="Nikon D50">D50</a></td>
<td colspan="1"></td>
<td colspan="1"></td>
<td colspan="3" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D40#Nikon_D40x" title="Nikon D40x">D40X</a></td>
<td colspan="5" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D60" title="Nikon D60">D60</a></td>
<td colspan="8" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D5000" title="Nikon D5000"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">D5000</span></a></td>
<td colspan="2" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D5100" title="Nikon D5100"><u><span style="border-bottom: 1px double #000; border-color:{{{2}}}">D5100</span></u></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1"><small><b>Entry-level</b></small></td>
<td colspan="4"></td>
<td colspan="3"></td>
<td colspan="10" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D40" title="Nikon D40">D40</a></td>
<td colspan="1"></td>
<td colspan="4" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D3000" title="Nikon D3000">D3000</a></td>
<td colspan="5" style="background:#ffb0b0"><a href="http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D3100" title="Nikon D3100"><u><span style="border-bottom: 1px double #000; border-color:{{{2}}}">D3100</span></u></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>It is immediately clear that the pro photo cameras are about to be replaced with new models, if only because of the age of the current cameras:</p>
<ul>
<li>3 years for the D3x</li>
<li>Nearly two years for the D3s</li>
<li>3 years for the D700</li>
<li>2 years for the D300s</li>
</ul>
<p>From this poiint, rumors are flaring up quite naturally (just look at how many wrong rumors we collected about the <a href="/en/cat/slr/nikon/nikon-d400/">Nikon D400</a>).</p>
<p>But the rhythm seems to speed up with the various announcements seen recently on Facebook, NikonRumors, PCHome (China), Tech.Hexun.com (China too), and a few others.</p>
<p>We long considered as certain that Summer 2011 would see the simultaneous launch of two pro cameras at Nikon, but the Japanese tsunami totally changed the landscape for a company whose main pro camera manufacturing plant was in Sendai (nearly exactly at the center of devastation in March). Nikon quickly reacted and decided to move its manufacturing resources to Malaysia. The latest news tell that machines are now humming with the people you relocated (with the help of special supporting bonuses) and the &#8220;<em>Made in Malaysia</em>&#8221; production is nearly here (with the same quality as in Japan).</p>
<div id="attachment_10780" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 410px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Nikon-D4-DSLR.jpg" alt="" title="Nikon-D4-DSLR" width="400" height="400" class="size-full wp-image-10780" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D4</p></div>
<p>On the other hand, it seems that it transformed the Marketing calendar that Nikon had built in January 2011. All the rumors were concentrating on a Summer with a <a href="/en/cat/slr/nikon/nikon-d4/">Nikon D4</a> and a <a href="/en/cat/slr/nikon/nikon-d400/">Nikon D400</a> (successors to the D3 and D300s). But in the recent weeks, everybody seems to be sharing an expectation of <strong>Nikon D4</strong> and <strong>Nikon D800</strong>  (successors to the D3 and D700). I could not seriously confirm this change but it seems that it could have been dictated by the need to optimize resources leading to something like:</p>
<ol>
<li>Two Full Frame cameras in September 2011 (<a href="http://nikonrumors.com/2011/07/19/nikon-rep-two-dslrs-will-be-announced-by-the-end-of-august.aspx/">according to NR</a>, it could even be August)</li>
<li>A D400 in January 2012</li>
</ol>
<p>the only problem of this scenario: The <a href="/fr/cat/reflex/nikon/nikon-d800/">Nikon D800</a> is supposed to use the Sony digital sensor being readied to power the <a href="/en/cat/slr/sony/sony-a99/">Sony A99</a> which should not appear before the end of 2011 (or even the first quarter of 2012).</p>
<p>So, it is still possible that the rumors heard here and there are going to be corrected by facts and that in September 2011 we&#8217;ll see a Nikon D4 (with a specific sensor designed exclusively by Nikon with a &#8220;pro&#8221; label) and a Nikon D400 (with an APS-C sensor shared with the <a href="/en/cat/slr/sony/sony-alpha-77/">Sony A77</a> -or slightly modified- and an &#8220;expert&#8221; label).</p>
<hr />
<h3>Nikon D400</h3>
<ul>
<li>24 MP APS-C CMOS sensor from Sony</li>
<li>ISO 100-51,200 (ext. ISO 102,400)</li>
<li>New AF</li>
<li>Continuous shooting: 9 fps</li>
<li>Full HD video</li>
<li>In-camera GPS?</li>
<li>Two SD cards</li>
</ul>
<h3>Nikon D800 or D700s</h3>
<ul>
<li>18 MP FF/FX CMOS sensor from Nikon</li>
<li>ISO 100-102,400 (ext. ???)</li>
<li>Same AF as D700 or D3</li>
<li>Continuous shooting: 9 fps</li>
<li>Full HD video</li>
<li>CF + SD cards</li>
</ul>
<h3>Nikon D4</h3>
<ul>
<li>18 MP FF/FX CMOS sensor from Nikon</li>
<li>ISO 100-102,400 (ext. ???)</li>
<li>New AF?</li>
<li>Continuous shooting: 10-15 fps</li>
<li>Full HD video</li>
<li>CF + SD cards</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/07/22/summary-analysis-of-nikon-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D800, not right now</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/05/03/nikon-d800-not-right-now/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/05/03/nikon-d800-not-right-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 18:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D800]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsunami]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=10290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Spanish webzine QUESABESDE.COM, Nikon has clarified (at least internally) what to do with the upcoming replacement of the Nikon D700 (FX large sensor with a high sensitivity). Because of the impact of the Japanese earthquake on the Sendai plant normally used to work on the pro SLR cameras of Nikon, the future [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_10322" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 410px"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/D700_Sealed_front.jpg" alt="D700" title="D700_Sealed_front" width="400" height="300" class="size-full wp-image-10322" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D700 or D800?</p></div>
<p>According to the Spanish webzine <a href="http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/nikon-d800-relevo-d700-retraso-nikon-d4,1_7550">QUESABESDE.COM</a>, Nikon has clarified (at least internally) what to do with the upcoming replacement of the Nikon D700 (FX large sensor with a high sensitivity).</p>
<p>Because of the impact of the Japanese earthquake on the Sendai plant normally used to work on the pro SLR cameras of Nikon, the future Nikon D800 was in a rather difficult position. According to QSD, the announcement has been moved from the beginning of Summer (July? about the same time as the 3rd birthday of the D700) to October with a D800 camera availability still pushed around the end of 2011 (Marketing launch is easy, making the camera is a bit more difficult).</p>
<div class="right25_box">
<p>Nikon D800 main feature: An FX sensor (Full Frame) with a high resolution (probably 18 or 20 MP) to be in a more direct competition with the <a href="/en/slr/canon/canon-eos-5d-mkii">Canon EOS 5D MkII</a>.</div>
<p>Obviously, the exact dates are not set yet because of the fluctuating nature of the news about the earthquake recovery. But this seems in line with what I hear about the industrial capacity of Nikon right now and in the coming months.</p>
<p>QSD also indicates that the Nikon D4 (successor to the Nikon D3s) will only be launched in 2012. But this is still very imprecise and needs to be confirmed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2011/05/03/nikon-d800-not-right-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Instant rebate on Nikon lenses at B&amp;H</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/03/instant-rebate-on-nikon-lenses-at-bh/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/03/instant-rebate-on-nikon-lenses-at-bh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D90]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=8468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[70-300mm VR Lens &#038; 18-55mm Bundled with the D-5000 ($250 Instant Rebate) 18-200mm VR Bundled with the D-90 ($300 Instant Rebate) 24-70 f/2.8G ED mm &#038; 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Bundled with D-300S or D-700 ($700 Instant Rebate) This offer ends 11/20/2010: Hurry up! And all the other rebates at B&#038;H.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_8469" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 355px"><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/681429-REG/Nikon__D700_Digital_SLR_Camera.html/BI/4603/KBID/5095"><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/nikon_d700_lenses_rebate.jpg" alt="" title="nikon_d700_lenses_rebate" width="345" height="345" class="size-full wp-image-8469" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D700 and pro lens kit: $700 rebate</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/658175-REG/Nikon_D5000_Digital_SLR_Camera.html/BI/4603/KBID/5095">70-300mm VR Lens &#038; 18-55mm Bundled with the D-5000</a> (<strong>$250</strong> Instant Rebate)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/595841-REG/Nikon_D90_SLR_Digital_Camera.html/BI/4603/KBID/5095">18-200mm VR Bundled with the D-90</a> (<strong>$300</strong> Instant Rebate)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/681429-REG/Nikon__D700_Digital_SLR_Camera.html/BI/4603/KBID/5095">24-70 f/2.8G ED mm &#038; 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Bundled with D-300S or D-700</a> (<strong>$700</strong> Instant Rebate)</p>
<p>This offer ends 11/20/2010: <strong>Hurry up!</strong></p>
<p>And all the other <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/find/newsLetter/Rebates.jsp/BI/4603/KBID/5095">rebates at B&#038;H</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/11/03/instant-rebate-on-nikon-lenses-at-bh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion: Canon EOS 5D MkII vs. Nikon D700</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/10/20/opinion-canon-eos-5d-mkii-vs-nikon-d700/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/10/20/opinion-canon-eos-5d-mkii-vs-nikon-d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D MkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=6615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allister Freeman is a photographer who recently switched from Canon to Nikon. In this post on his blog (Canon 5D Mark 2 versus Nikon D700 – My thoughts), he tries to give a hands-on experience report to support his switch. Actually, the most important of his issues was with ISO sensitivity and general behavior of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.allisterfreemanphotographyblog.com/">Allister Freeman</a> is a photographer who recently switched from Canon to Nikon. In this post on his blog (<a href="http://www.allisterfreemanphotographyblog.com/2010/07/canon-5d-mark-2-versus-nikon-d700-my-thoughts/">Canon 5D Mark 2 versus Nikon D700 – My thoughts</a>), he tries to give a hands-on experience report to support his switch.</p>
<p>Actually, the most important of his issues was with ISO sensitivity and general behavior of the <a href="/en/slr/canon-eos-5d-mkii">Canon EOS 5D MkII</a> in low light (including digital noise and AF). Despite that the Canon is still a very strong seller, the reduced sensor resolution of the <a href="/en/slr/nikon-d700">Nikon D700</a> has been superbly exploited to provide maximum sensitivity and minimum noise. I cannot help but agree with Allister.</p>
<p>A visit to <a href="http://www.allisterfreemanphotographyblog.com/2010/07/canon-5d-mark-2-versus-nikon-d700-my-thoughts/">his post</a> will also show a nice set of pictures made during a wedding in the Gosfield Hall in Essex (England) and showing his excellent documentary style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/10/20/opinion-canon-eos-5d-mkii-vs-nikon-d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon D800: Possible features</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/09/20/nikon-d800-possible-features/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/09/20/nikon-d800-possible-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D750]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 820]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 850]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 900]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony Alpha 950]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=7772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the leaks have been collected by our friends of Reportages Photo and they may allow us to discover some of the features of the next Nikon D800 (some believe that it will replace the existing Nikon D700, FX Full Frame photo camera famous for its excellent sensitivity coming from using a reasonably low resolution [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the leaks have been collected by <a href="http://www.reportagesphotos.fr/A2246-nikon-d800-les-premieres-caracteristiques-du-rempla-ant-du-nikon-d700.html">our friends of Reportages Photo</a> and they may allow us to discover some of the features of the next <strong>Nikon D800</strong> (some believe that it will replace the existing <a href="/en/slr/nikon/nikon-d700">Nikon D700</a>, FX Full Frame photo camera famous for its excellent sensitivity coming from using a reasonably low resolution to get very wide pixels).</p>
<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/nikon_d800_leak.jpg" alt="Nikon D800 leak" title="nikon_d800_leak" width="280" height="210" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-7394" /></p>
<p>As a matter of fact, an online Chinese eCommerce web site published a product page for the Nikon D800. A photo, some features somewhat far from what is expected from Nikon, but after all, why not?</p>
<p>First and foremost, the resolution would (fast) climb to 24 MP, or near to the current maximum for Full Frame digital sensors, indicating a possible use of the Full Frame photo sensor from Sony (already used on Sony <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-900">Alpha 900</a> and <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-850">Alpha 850</a>, but with some video-capture ability added).</p>
<p>Next, we find a shutter with speeds from 30s to 1/8000s for continuous bursts of 7 frames/second, video recording in 720p and 1080p, ISO 200-6400 (ext. to ISO 100-25600) light sensitivity, exposure metering using a 1005-RGB-point sensor and system, Nikon Multi-CAM 3500FX AF 51-point AF system, a fixed LCD screen attached to the back of the camera with a 3&#8243; (7,5 cm) LCD with 921.000 pixels.</p>
<p>Clearly, this would build a relatively easy to predict kind of camera (apart from the high resolution of the sensor which would indicate Nikon is leaving the lonely track of low resolution Full Frame to go and catch up with Canon and Sony where they already succeed).</p>
<p>But this is still surprising. If this is more than an unfounded rumour, it will allow a prediction of the direction Sony is taking in terms of FF sensors and the successor to the Sony <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-900">Alpha 900</a> and <a href="/en/slr/sony/sony-alpha-850">Alpha 850</a> would keep their resolution at 24 MP while video capture would be added like on the Nikon D800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/09/20/nikon-d800-possible-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photokina: Expectations for Nikon</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/07/14/photokina-expectations-for-nikon/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/07/14/photokina-expectations-for-nikon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D4000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photokina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=6193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for all of photography brands, the upcoming Photokina fair in Köln (Germany) will be a major meeting point with the after-crisis market. Not only because of the launches that will be done there, but also because the photographers expectations have been piling up tidily (maybe be too high?). Let&#8217;s see what is really to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for all of photography brands, the upcoming <strong>Photokina</strong> fair in Köln (Germany) will be a major meeting point with the after-crisis market. Not only because of the launches that will be done there, but also because the photographers expectations have been piling up tidily (maybe be too high?). Let&#8217;s see what is really to be expected here and what Nikon will show in terms of news and announcements.</p>
<p>First and foremost, let&#8217;s notice that after a deluge of news in 2008 and 2009, the yellow brand seemed a little slow (and farming money from its advance, I should say). It is probably a coincidence and the simultaneous occurrence of several jumps in the various product families, but it should also be considered as a warning of things to come in the digital SLR product lines.</p>
<div id="attachment_244" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nikon_d90.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-244" title="Nikon D90" src="http://ylovephoto.com/fr/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/nikon_d90-300x300.jpg" alt="Nikon D90" width="300" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Nikon D90</p></div>
<p>The cameras that are most probably going to be replaced or renewed are (according to the data I could get):</p>
<ul>
<li>The Nikon D90 has grown past its normal life since the very noisy launch of 2008 and its 720p video capture needs to be upgraded to keep annoying the competition. So, probably, here comes the <strong>Nikon D7000</strong> for early September: 16MP DX-format sensor (APS-C size), 1080p video capture @ 24fps, 26-point AF system, climbing sensitivity (but not as high as the FX sensor of the D3s, let&#8217;s not dream: Native ISO 100-6400).</li>
<li>Nikon may renew, or may only give the last orientations for the evolution of its pro line after the Nikon D3s and D3x. But there may not be much more than a wooden prototype.</li>
</ul>
<p>On the other side, no replacement for the D700 in 2010 (with an FX sensor). Both pro and amateur sales representatives where told that this impressively beautiful Full Frame photo camera will see its successor only after the professional shows of early 2011. Probably, for a real announcement before Summer 2011 and availability after Summer. We will have to be very patient and Nikon certainly did not have as many sales as needed to fully convince the marketing department that a (relatively) low resolution FX (Full Frame) sensor is the way to go. They see the competition (Canon and Sony, first) rushing for a pixel-race that may not be ideal for image quality but stays convincing for most applications.</p>
<p><img src="http://ylovephoto.com/images/logo/nikon.png" width="145" height="145" align="left">The $1000 open question is still in front of the low-end of the market. On one side, I hear that the Nikon D4000 is ready to launch; On the other side, I hear that it does not even exist. But no source seems more reliable than another. It may simply come from the fact that rumours abound and are always less precise for entry-level photo cameras, or it may be that the new entry-level camera from Nikon will hold a completely different name and people get lost by this change. We will have to wait a little more, I guess.</p>
<p>Currently, Nikon&#8217;s development efforts are centered on the preparation of a a new hybrid compact camera (how should I name these photo cameras which look like a point-and-shoot, host interchangeable lenses and an APS-C sensor that would be acceptable in a mid-range SLR camera?). For Nikon, it will be the means to put a whole new range in orbit, bringing two new major features:</p>
<ul>
<li>Much improved video capture modes with options to simplify significantly the operation and certainly some technical details to reduce the issues linked to autofocus while shooting video.</li>
<li>A deep integration with Internet and the communication networks. It is clear that these cameras (there will be a full range of them) will be very near to Flickr, YouTube and Facebook. WiFi integration will be part of the scope.</li>
</ul>
<p>the first announcements have been done by Makoto Kimura in an interview with <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-08/nikon-plans-new-concept-slr-camera-as-early-as-this-year-kimura-says.html">Bloomberg</a>, and confirmed by others more recently. If the cameras are scheduled for the end of the year (1st quarter or 2011, at most), Nikon seems ready to lift the curtain on many of the features and details of new range in September 2010 at the Photokina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2010/07/14/photokina-expectations-for-nikon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Nikon D700x, but a Nikon D700s</title>
		<link>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/08/29/no-nikon-d700x-but-a-nikon-d700s/</link>
		<comments>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/08/29/no-nikon-d700x-but-a-nikon-d700s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yves Roumazeilles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ylovephoto.com/en/?p=4236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to SPTS, a Nikon authorized camera repair center, we will see no Nikon D700x, but the next improved version of the Nikon D700 will hold the name of Nikon D700s. Seeing that this kind of terminology is now used by Nikon these days, it seems credible, even if nothing is said about a confirmation [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://blog.sp-ts.com/public/item/238559">SPTS</a>, a Nikon authorized camera repair center, we will see no Nikon D700x, but the next improved version of the <a href="/en/slr/nikon-d700/">Nikon D700</a> will hold the name of <strong>Nikon D700s</strong>.</p>
<p>Seeing that this kind of terminology is now used by Nikon these days, it seems credible, even if nothing is said about a confirmation by Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ylovephoto.com/en/2009/08/29/no-nikon-d700x-but-a-nikon-d700s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
